Conservative leadership candidate Kemi Badenoch has faced criticism for her involvement in a report that has been accused of stigmatizing autism. The document, launched by Badenoch, suggests that individuals with autism receive “economic advantages and protections” and better treatment in schools. Former Conservative cabinet minister Robert Buckland expressed concerns about the report, stating that it should not stigmatize or generalize certain groups.
This controversy comes on the heels of previous remarks by Badenoch, including her claim that statutory maternity pay is excessive and her assertion that thousands of civil servants should be in jail. Badenoch is currently competing against Robert Jenrick for the position of Tory leader. Jenrick recently sparked controversy himself by admitting to covering up cartoon murals at a processing center for lone child migrants during his time as immigration minister.
The report endorsed by Badenoch, which features contributions from 24 of her supporters, addresses ways in which the Conservative Party can recover from its election defeat to Labour. It criticizes the socialization of mental health and suggests that individuals diagnosed with autism and anxiety receive special treatment that may not be beneficial in the long run.
Robert Buckland, who conducted a review on employment rates among autistic individuals, expressed skepticism about the report’s claims. He emphasized that anxiety is not a neurodiverse condition and that autism should not be equated with mental health issues. Buckland’s review found that many autistic individuals face barriers to employment, leading to economic inactivity.
The Liberal Democrats’ justice spokesperson, Josh Babarinde, lambasted Badenoch for her perceived lack of compassion and understanding of people’s lives, suggesting that she is out of touch with the British public. The report’s comments have raised concerns about Badenoch’s approach to sensitive issues like neurodiversity and mental health.
In response to the backlash, a spokesperson for Badenoch defended the report, stating that it does not intend to promote prejudice. They emphasized that the report highlights the growing impact of mental health on society’s productivity and does not seek to discriminate against any particular group.
Overall, the criticism surrounding Kemi Badenoch’s involvement in the report underscores the importance of addressing neurodiversity and mental health issues with sensitivity and evidence-based approaches. It also highlights the need for political leaders to engage with diverse perspectives and prioritize understanding and compassion in their policymaking.
