A historic bill is being proposed to legalize assisted dying with strict safeguards in place. The bill emphasizes the need for patients to be over 18, mentally capable, terminally ill with a prognosis of six months, and have a clear wish for assisted dying. Two independent doctors must assess eligibility, and a high court judge must approve the application. Coercion of patients would result in up to 14 years in prison.
Critics have raised concerns about safeguards, such as “doctor shopping” and the assumption of mental capacity. Some suggest a more rigorous approach, including cross-examination in court by an advocate. The bill is set to receive further scrutiny after the initial vote on November 29.
Proponents of the bill believe it offers a safe choice for those at the end of their lives while improving palliative care. MPs have three weeks to review the bill before the debate. However, there are still many undecided Labour MPs, and the numbers remain uncertain.
There is an organized system in parliament for both pro and anti-assisted dying sides. Some MPs are waiting to see the legislation before making a decision. Those opposed have hosted events with disabled parliamentarians and legal experts to voice their concerns about the bill.
The debate in parliament has become heated, with some MPs feeling resentful and not wanting it to turn into a culture war. Despite opposition from some cabinet ministers, the majority of the cabinet is expected to back the change in law. However, influential names like the chancellor and home secretary remain undecided.
Advocates for the bill believe it is the strongest proposal to improve choices and protections for dying people. They argue that the current system leads to traumatic deaths and the need for better end-of-life options. On the other hand, opponents argue that the bill is rushed and overlooks issues in the palliative care system and social care crisis.
