news-14102024-204647

The Tory leadership candidate Kemi Badenoch has faced criticism for a campaign pamphlet that made controversial remarks about autistic people. The pamphlet, titled Conservatism in Crisis, suggested that individuals with autism receive “better treatment” and “economic privileges and protections.” These comments have sparked backlash from various individuals, including former cabinet colleague Robert Buckland.

Buckland, who conducted a review into employment rates among autistic individuals, expressed concerns that the essay’s section on autism was “muddled” and could be perceived as stigmatizing the condition. He emphasized the importance of distinguishing between autism as a developmental disability and anxiety as a mental health condition. Buckland’s review found that many autistic individuals face barriers to finding employment, leading to economic inactivity.

The essay argued that being diagnosed as neurodiverse, including with anxiety or autism, now comes with economic advantages and protections. It suggested that children with these conditions may receive better treatment or equipment at school, as well as improved employment protections in the workforce. However, it also raised concerns about the costs associated with making adjustments for mental health conditions in schools and workplaces.

A spokesperson for Badenoch defended the essay, stating that it was important to have open discussions about these issues without being misunderstood or misrepresented by the media. They highlighted the need to address the changing societal approach to mental health and evaluate its effectiveness in improving outcomes.

Badenoch, who is considered a frontrunner in the Tory leadership contest, has faced criticism for other controversial statements, including comments about maternity pay in the UK. Despite the backlash, she continues to be a prominent figure in the Conservative party.

Overall, the controversy surrounding Badenoch’s campaign pamphlet highlights the importance of informed and sensitive discussions around neurodiversity and mental health. It serves as a reminder of the need for accurate information and understanding when addressing such complex issues in society.